Would you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@geneven wrote: I have a feeling that some commercial arrangements are going into the calculations -- like, what size does 7-11 want to sell? Or some company. I could be wrong, of course. Read full...
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@EveB wrote: Unfortunately, Soylent has been really adamant (misguidedly I think) that they don't want to do retail at all. Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@Tark wrote: I mentioned one gallon bottles a few days back, but this seems a better idea. Read full topic
View ArticleClik here to view.
Would you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@Lazy wrote: How about milk jugs while we're at it? Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@Tark wrote: Hmm good idea. But why stop at milk jugs? container trucks filled with soylent delivered to home is another one that i have in mind. Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@kennufs wrote: Naw, that's just silly. What we need is Soylent piped into our homes, as ubiquitous as water. Read full topic
View ArticleClik here to view.
Would you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@Kouri wrote: I would prefer a bigger bottle, maybe 700 or 800 ml. 400 isn't really going to do much for me. Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@geneven wrote: Rob actually suggested that in one of his interviews. Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@atheist4thecause wrote: We talked about shipping a little bit, but it could very well be that 400 mL bottles are cheaper to ship than 500 mL bottles. Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@nanciejk wrote: 400 is perfect for me, since I want 1200 cals of Soylent in a "100%" Soylent day. It's convenient enough that I think it'll offset the time/expense involved in supplementing for 100%...
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@Ric wrote: 500 calories would be better for me, personally. But because of satiety and volume, I think 400 calories/14 ounces works better for a mass market approach. Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@gambit wrote: I prefer the idea of 400 calorie meals to 500 as that is what I'm doing currently with the powder, then again I'm not planning on switching to 2.0, so I don't have much of a dog in this...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Would you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@RobertThorn wrote: The perfectionist in me would prefer the 500 ml (50 cl) as it's comparable to the powdered Soylent and generally a good round number But really it doesn't matter that much if (as...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Would you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@pauldwaite wrote: RobertThorn: Most of us can agree that using a (different) version number for the liquid version is silly Long-term, sure, it would be. But for now, given that Rob said they intend...
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@smeggot wrote: I prefer 400mL x 5 meals, as opposed to 500mL x 4 meals.···One big "milk jug" for a day's worth of Soylent 2.0 sounds best, though. But then that's essentially what the powder does....
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@casssax wrote: I would prefer 500ml. That's what I drink for breakfast and lunch now, and by the time I get home from work I'm hungry. If I was only getting 400ml for breakfast and lunch I'd start...
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@atheist4thecause wrote: Do you think your body would adjust with time? Read full topic
View ArticleWould you prefer 500ml Soylent 2.0 bottles?
@GregH wrote: The steel thermos I've been using to take Soylent to work holds about 750ml and I usually split that into two mini lunches during the day. I anticipate two 2.0 bottles being a lot more...
View Article
